Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

A comparison of artificial neural networks used for river forecasting

ADD TO MY LIST
 
Author(s): C. W. Dawson | R. L. Wilby

Journal: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
ISSN 1027-5606

Volume: 3;
Issue: 4;
Start page: 529;
Date: 1999;
VIEW PDF   PDF DOWNLOAD PDF   Download PDF Original page

ABSTRACT
This paper compares the performance of two artificial neural network (ANN) models – the multi layer perceptron (MLP) and the radial basis function network (RBF) – with a stepwise multiple linear regression model (SWMLR) and zero order forecasts (ZOF) of river flow. All models were trained using 15 minute rainfall-runoff data for the River Mole, a flood-prone tributary of the River Thames, UK. The models were then used to forecast river flows with a 6 hour lead time and 15 minute resolution, given only antecedent rainfall and discharge measurements. Two seasons (winter and spring) were selected for model testing using a cross-validation technique and a range of diagnostic statistics. Overall, the MLP was more skillful than the RBF, SWMLR and ZOF models. However, the RBF flow forecasts were only marginally better than those of the simpler SWMLR and ZOF models. The results compare favourably with a review of previous studies and further endorse claims that ANNs are well suited to rainfall-runoff modelling and (potentially) real-time flood forecasting.

Tango Jona
Tangokurs Rapperswil-Jona

     Affiliate Program