Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery

ADD TO MY LIST
 
Author(s): Mehta Yatin | Arora Dheeraj | Sharma Krishna | Mishra Yugal | Wasir Harpreet | Trehan Naresh

Journal: Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
ISSN 0971-9784

Volume: 11;
Issue: 2;
Start page: 90;
Date: 2008;
Original page

Keywords: Paravertebral analgesia | pulmonary function test | robotic cardiac surgery | thoracic epidural analgesia

ABSTRACT
Minimally invasive surgery with robotic assistance should elicit minimal pain. Regional analgesic techniques have shown excellent analgesia after thoracotomy. Thus the aim of this study was to compare thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) technique with paravertebral block (PVB) technique in these patients with regard to quality of analgesia, complications, and haemodynamic and respiratory parameters. This was a prospective randomised study involving 36 patients undergoing elective robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). TEA or PVB were administered in these patients. The results revealed no significant differences with regard to demographics, haemodynamics, and arterial blood gases. Pulmonary functions were better maintained in PVB group postoperatively; however, this was statistically insignificant. The quality of analgesia was also comparable in both the groups. We conclude that PVB is a safe and effective technique for postoperative analgesia after robotic-assisted CABG and is comparable to TEA with regard to quality of analgesia.

Tango Jona
Tangokurs Rapperswil-Jona

     Affiliate Program