Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

A Comparison of VaR Estimation Procedures for Leptokurtic Equity Index Returns

ADD TO MY LIST
 
Author(s): Siddarth Madhav R | Malay Bhattacharyya

Journal: Advances in Molecular Imaging
ISSN 2161-6728

Volume: 02;
Issue: 01;
Start page: 13;
Date: 2012;
Original page

Keywords: Dynamic VaR | GARCH | EVT | Johnson SU | Pearson Type IV | Mixture of Normal Distributions | Manly | John Draper | Yeo-Johnson Transformations

ABSTRACT
The paper presents and tests Dynamic Value at Risk (VaR) estimation procedures for equity index returns. Volatility clustering and leptokurtosis are well-documented characteristics of such time series. An ARMA (1, 1)-GARCH (1, 1) approach models the inherent autocorrelation and dynamic volatility. Fattailed behavior is modeled in two ways. In the first approach, the ARMA-GARCH process is run assuming alternatively that the standardized residuals are distributed with Pearson Type IV, Johnson SU, Manly’s exponential transformation, normal and t-distributions. In the second approach, the ARMA-GARCH process is run with the pseudonormal assumption, the parameters calculated with the pseudo maximum likelihood procedure, and the standardized residuals are later alternatively modeled with Mixture of Normal distributions, Extreme Value Theory and other power transformations such as John-Draper, Bickel-Doksum, Manly, Yeo-Johnson and certain combinations of the above. The first approach yields five models, and the second ap-proach yields nine. These are tested with six equity index return time series using rolling windows. These models are compared by computing the 99%, 97.5% and 95% VaR violations and contrasting them with the expected number of violations.
Save time & money - Smart Internet Solutions      Why do you need a reservation system?