Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

The comparison of Virtual Machine Migration Performance between XEN-HVM, XEN-PV, Open-VZ, KVM-FV, KVM-PV

ADD TO MY LIST
 
Author(s): Igli Tafa | Elma Zanaj | Elinda Kajo | Ariana Bejleri | Aleksander Xhuvani

Journal: International Journal of Computer Science and Management Studies
ISSN 2231-5268

Volume: 11;
Issue: 02;
Start page: 65;
Date: 2011;
VIEW PDF   PDF DOWNLOAD PDF   Download PDF Original page

Keywords: Hypervisor | XEN-PV | XEN-HVM | Open-VZ | CPU

ABSTRACT
Based on our previous experience we want to compare theperformance between five hypervisors: XEN-PV, XENHVM,Open-VZ,KVM-FV,KVM-PV We have simulated themigration of a virtual machine by using a warning failureapproach. Based on some experiments we have compared CPUConsumption, Memory Utilization, Total Migration Time andDowntime. We have also tested the hypervisor’s performance bychanging the packet’s size from 1500 byte to 32 byte. From thesetests we have concluded that Open-VZ has a bigger CPUConsumption than XEN-PV, but the Total Migration time issmaller than in XEN-PV. XEN-HVM has a worse performancethan XEN-PV, especially regarding to Downtimeparameter.KVM-FV has the worse performance but it canimprove by modifying it, so in this way we use KVM-PV whichhas approximately the same performance with Xen-HVM

Tango Jona
Tangokurs Rapperswil-Jona

     Affiliate Program