Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review

ADD TO MY LIST
 
Author(s): Roshanov Pavel | Misra Shikha | Gerstein Hertzel | Garg Amit | Sebaldt Rolf | Mackay Jean | Weise-Kelly Lorraine | Navarro Tamara | Wilczynski Nancy | Haynes R Brian

Journal: Implementation Science
ISSN 1748-5908

Volume: 6;
Issue: 1;
Start page: 92;
Date: 2011;
Original page

ABSTRACT
Abstract Background The use of computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) may improve chronic disease management, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, ongoing disease and treatment monitoring, and patient behavior modification. The objective of this review was to determine if CCDSSs improve the processes of chronic care (such as diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of disease) and associated patient outcomes (such as effects on biomarkers and clinical exacerbations). Methods We conducted a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid's EBM Reviews database, Inspec, and reference lists for potentially eligible articles published up to January 2010. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the use of CCDSSs to usual practice or non-CCDSS controls. Trials were eligible if at least one component of the CCDSS was designed to support chronic disease management. We considered studies 'positive' if they showed a statistically significant improvement in at least 50% of relevant outcomes. Results Of 55 included trials, 87% (n = 48) measured system impact on the process of care and 52% (n = 25) of those demonstrated statistically significant improvements. Sixty-five percent (36/55) of trials measured impact on, typically, non-major (surrogate) patient outcomes, and 31% (n = 11) of those demonstrated benefits. Factors of interest to decision makers, such as cost, user satisfaction, system interface and feature sets, unique design and deployment characteristics, and effects on user workflow were rarely investigated or reported. Conclusions A small majority (just over half) of CCDSSs improved care processes in chronic disease management and some improved patient health. Policy makers, healthcare administrators, and practitioners should be aware that the evidence of CCDSS effectiveness is limited, especially with respect to the small number and size of studies measuring patient outcomes.
Why do you need a reservation system?      Save time & money - Smart Internet Solutions