Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

First-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori: Are the standard triple therapies obsolete? A different perspective

ADD TO MY LIST
 
Author(s): György Miklós Buzás

Journal: World Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN 1007-9327

Volume: 16;
Issue: 31;
Start page: 3865;
Date: 2010;
Original page

Keywords: Antibiotics | Eradication | Helicobacter pylori | Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT
Studies concerning the eradication of Helicobacter pylori have resulted in a proliferation of meta-analyses. To date, there are 303 meta-analyses cited in PubMed, 113 dealing with the therapy of the infection. A chronological analysis of the results of meta-analyses performed between 1998 and 2010 shows that first-line standard triple therapies achieved eradication rates on an intention-to-treat basis of around 80%; prolonging treatment to 14, but not 10 d should improve the results. The proton pump inhibitors have a similar efficiency, and giving a double dose is more efficient than the standard doses of these drugs. Triple and quadruple therapies proved to be equivalent. Based on meta-analytical data, the decrease in efficiency over time cannot be substantiated: eradication rates < 80% followed from the introduction of triple therapies. As alternatives, ranitidine bismuth citrate-, levofloxacin- or furazolidone-based therapies were shown to obtain the same eradication rates as standard triple regimens. Sequential therapies and quadruple non-bismuth-based therapies were superior to standard triple therapies but their use is limited to certain countries. In the author’s opinion, and from a meta-analytical viewpoint, standard triple therapies cannot yet be considered obsolete. Furthermore, non-inferiority trials are proposed for the future, including assessment of local contemporary antimicrobial resistance profiles and the CagA and CYP2C19 status of the enrolled patients.

Tango Rapperswil
Tango Rapperswil

     Affiliate Program