Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

Implementation of a workplace smoking ban in bars: The limits of local discretion

ADD TO MY LIST
 
Author(s): Montini Theresa | Bero Lisa

Journal: BMC Public Health
ISSN 1471-2458

Volume: 8;
Issue: 1;
Start page: 402;
Date: 2008;
Original page

ABSTRACT
Abstract Background In January 1998, the California state legislature extended a workplace smoking ban to bars. The purpose of this study was to explore the conditions that facilitate or hinder compliance with a smoking ban in bars. Methods We studied the implementation of the smoking ban in bars by interviewing three sets of policy participants: bar employers responsible for complying with the law; local government officials responsible for enforcing the law; and tobacco control activists who facilitated implementation. We transcribed the interviews and did a qualitative analysis of the text. Results The conditions that facilitated bar owners' compliance with a smoking ban in bars included: if the cost to comply was minimal; if the bars with which they were in competition were in compliance with the smoking ban; and if there was authoritative, consistent, coordinated, and uniform enforcement. Conversely, the conditions that hindered compliance included: if the law had minimal sanctions; if competing bars in the area allowed smoking; and if enforcement was delayed or inadequate. Conclusion Many local enforcers wished to forfeit their local discretion and believed the workplace smoking ban in bars would be best implemented by a state agency. The potential implication of this study is that, given the complex nature of local politics, smoking bans in bars are best implemented at a broader provincial or national level.
Save time & money - Smart Internet Solutions     

Tango Jona
Tangokurs Rapperswil-Jona