Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

Modelling Amazonian forest eddy covariance data: a comparison of big leaf versus sun/shade models for the C-14 tower at Manaus I. Canopy photosynthesis

ADD TO MY LIST
 
Author(s): Mercado Lina | Lloyd Jon | Carswell Fiona | Malhi Yadvinder | Meir Patrick | Nobre Antonio Donato

Journal: Acta Amazonica
ISSN 0044-5967

Volume: 36;
Issue: 1;
Start page: 69;
Date: 2006;
Original page

Keywords: modelling canopy photosynthesis | rainforest | Amazon | eddy-covariance

ABSTRACT
In this study, we concentrate on modelling gross primary productivity using two simple approaches to simulate canopy photosynthesis: "big leaf" and "sun/shade" models. Two approaches for calibration are used: scaling up of canopy photosynthetic parameters from the leaf to the canopy level and fitting canopy biochemistry to eddy covariance fluxes. Validation of the models is achieved by using eddy covariance data from the LBA site C14. Comparing the performance of both models we conclude that numerically (in terms of goodness of fit) and qualitatively, (in terms of residual response to different environmental variables) sun/shade does a better job. Compared to the sun/shade model, the big leaf model shows a lower goodness of fit and fails to respond to variations in the diffuse fraction, also having skewed responses to temperature and VPD. The separate treatment of sun and shade leaves in combination with the separation of the incoming light into direct beam and diffuse make sun/shade a strong modelling tool that catches more of the observed variability in canopy fluxes as measured by eddy covariance. In conclusion, the sun/shade approach is a relatively simple and effective tool for modelling photosynthetic carbon uptake that could be easily included in many terrestrial carbon models.
Affiliate Program      Why do you need a reservation system?