Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

Responsiveness and minimal important differences after revision total hip arthroplasty

ADD TO MY LIST
 
Author(s): Shi Hon-Yi | Chang Je-Ken | Wong Chi-Yin | Wang Jun-Wen | Tu Yuan-Kun | Chiu Herng-Chia | Lee King-Teh

Journal: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN 1471-2474

Volume: 11;
Issue: 1;
Start page: 261;
Date: 2010;
Original page

ABSTRACT
Abstract Background The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is currently weighted more heavily when evaluating health status, particularly regarding medical treatments and interventions. However, it is rarely used by physicians to compare responsiveness. Additionally, responsiveness estimates derived by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) before and after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) have not been clinically compared. This study compared responsiveness and minimal important differences (MID) between HHS and SF-36. Methods All revision THA patients completed the disease-specific HHS and the generic SF-36 before and 6 months after surgery. Scores using these instruments were interpreted by generalized estimating equation (GEE) before and after revision THA. The bootstrap estimation and modified Jacknife test were used to derive 95% confidence intervals for differences in the responsiveness estimates. Results Comparisons of effect size (ES), standardized response means (SRM), relative efficiency (RE) (>1) and MID indicated that the responsiveness of HHS was superior to that of SF-36. The ES and SRM for pain and physical functions in the HHS were significantly larger than those of the SF-36 (p < 0.001). Conclusion The data in this study indicated that clinicians and health researchers should weight disease-specific measures more heavily than generic measures when evaluating treatment outcomes.
Affiliate Program     

Tango Jona
Tangokurs Rapperswil-Jona