Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

Assessing exchangeability in indirect and mixed treatment comparisons

Author(s): Alemayehu D

Journal: Comparative Effectiveness Research
ISSN 1179-8483

Volume: 2011;
Issue: default;
Start page: 51;
Date: 2011;
Original page

Demissie AlemayehuPfizer, Inc, Statistics Department, New York, USAAbstract: In comparative effectiveness research (CER), investigators often resort to methods of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons, due to the unavailability of head-to-head comparative data from randomized clinical trials for competing treatment options. However, implicit in the available indirect comparison techniques is an assumption of exchangeability, which in practice cannot be conclusively verified. This paper discusses the implications of violations of this assumption, and describes approaches to evaluate its validity and steps that may be taken to minimize the impact on conclusions drawn from such studies.Keywords: network meta-analysis, heterogeneity, comparative effectiveness research, systematic review
RPA Switzerland

Robotic Process Automation Switzerland


Tango Rapperswil
Tango Rapperswil