Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

Conners Parent Rating Scale-Revised Short: Turkish Standardization Study

Author(s): Sema KANER | Şener BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK | Elvan İŞERİ

Journal: Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi
ISSN 1300-0667

Volume: 50;
Issue: 2;
Start page: 100;
Date: 2013;
Original page

Keywords: CPRS-RS | factor analysis | validity | reliability

Background: The aim of this study was to adapt the Conners’s Parent Rating Scale-Revised Short form (CPRS-RS) to Turkish population. Methods: Parents of 2736 children aged 6-17 from 7 cities in Turkey were included in the study. Construct validity of the CPRS-RS was tested by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and intercorrelations between the subscales. Besides, the Conners’ Parent Rating Scales-Revised Long version (CPRS-RL), Conners’ Parent Rating Scales-48 (CPRS-48), Conners’ Teacher Rating Scales-Revised Short (CTRS-RS), Conners-Wells’ Adolescent Self-Report-Revised Short form (CASS-RS), and the Revised Problem Behavior Checklist (RPBCL), which measures the same structures as CPRS-RS, were used to assess validity of the scale. In addition, item analysis was conducted. Internal reliability and test-retest reliability at a 8 week interval were calculated for the CPRS-RS’ subscales. Results: Results of CFA suggested that the original form of the CPRS-RS was valid for the Turkish community. Correlations between the subscales were moderate. Relationship of CPRS-RS with CTRS-RS, CASS-RS and RPBCL were low to moderate; CPRS-RS discriminates groups of upper 27% and lower 27% significantly. Cronbach alpha and split-half reliability coefficients of the subscales were between 0.73 and 0.86 and 0.72 and 0.85, respectively. Test-retest reliability coefficients of the subscales were between 0.56 and 0.72. Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the CPRS-RS were quite adequate. (Archives of Neuropsychiatry 2013; 50: 100-109)
RPA Switzerland

Robotic Process Automation Switzerland


Tango Rapperswil
Tango Rapperswil