Academic Journals Database
Disseminating quality controlled scientific knowledge

Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings

ADD TO MY LIST
 
Author(s): Sabine Haumann | Volker Hohmann | Markus Meis | Tobias Herzke | Thomas Lenarz | Andreas Büchner

Journal: Audiology Research
ISSN 2039-4330

Volume: 2;
Issue: 1;
Start page: e12;
Date: 2012;
Original page

Keywords: cochlear implant | medical audiology | psychoacoustics/hearing science | speech perception.

ABSTRACT
Owing to technological progress and a growing body of clinical experience, indication criteria for cochlear implants (CI) are being extended to less severe hearing impairments. It is, therefore, worth reconsidering these indication criteria by introducing novel testing procedures. The diagnostic evidence collected will be evaluated. The investigation includes postlingually deafened adults seeking a CI. Prior to surgery, speech perception tests [Freiburg Speech Test and Oldenburg sentence (OLSA) test] were performed unaided and aided using the Oldenburg Master Hearing Aid (MHA) system. Linguistic skills were assessed with the visual Text Reception Threshold (TRT) test, and general state of health, socio-economic status (SES) and subjective hearing were evaluated through questionnaires. After surgery, the speech tests were repeated aided with a CI. To date, 97 complete data sets are available for evaluation. Statistical analyses showed significant correlations between postsurgical speech reception threshold (SRT) measured with the adaptive OLSA test and pre-surgical data such as the TRT test (r=-0.29), SES (r=-0.22) and (if available) aided SRT (r=0.53). The results suggest that new measures and setups such as the TRT test, SES and speech perception with the MHA provide valuable extra information regarding indication for CI.

Tango Rapperswil
Tango Rapperswil

    
RPA Switzerland

Robotic Process Automation Switzerland